Successful dealmakers and investors understand the value of getting the right information to evaluate a new opportunity. Likewise, in the oil and gas space, having a solid understanding of a prospective investment play will enhance the quality of the assumptions and help set realistic expectations. This is particularly true when it comes to mineral title, land title and other regional title issues. An informed buyer will always conduct an assessment of title complexity, potential ‘red-flag’ issues, and the length of time it will take to confirm title.
Questions that should be asked, for example, are:
The answers to these questions will vary widely and differ from state to state, or basin to basin, so obtaining the targeted information is important. Our regionally-focused teams across the United States collaborate with clients to provide this kind of insight at the outset of a deal and throughout the asset management process. The following highlights a sample of common title characteristics of three of today’s most active regions.
This region is characterized by multi-section, old production drilling sites that often have complicated title issues, such as:
Old production in this region often holds leases pre-dating the statutory Pugh clause of May 27, 1977, giving rise to:
This region has specific challenges that come with drilling on federal, state and Native American lands, such as:
Regional complexities and difficult title matters can materially influence the attractiveness of a prospect. Understanding the mineral title and regulatory environment early and often will prevent surprises and minimize unforeseen risks. When it comes to finding and closing a good deal, the value of doing a title analysis should not be underestimated.